Case Studies

Flash must be installed to view this video.
View this video on YouTube

Video text transcript

One of the policies we looked at was the climate change levy, which was introduced in 2001 and which was at the time -- and is still today -- one of the major policy initiatives by the UK government to deal with climate change and reduced emissions from companies in the industrial sector. 

We did a study where we used firm level data from the ONS to examine and evaluate the effect of this policy. The firm level data was crucial because some firms, not all firms, were exposed to that, so you could basically, by exploiting the variation between firms that were exposed and which were not exposed, you could examine the effect and that's what we did.

So we had a lot of data we combined, a lot of datasets: the productivity data from the ARD and the fuel consumption data from the Quarterly Fuels Inquiry, and we combined that with information from HMRC and from DEFRA at the time on which firms received the full tax rate, which ones were exempted from the tax rate, and which ones were eligible and which ones were not. 

And then we found that basically the tax had quite a significant impact particularly on electricity consumption of companies that faced the full tax rate. Of course at the time, and still today, a big concern for governments imposing such climate change policies is that they might endanger competitiveness of the companies affected. And so we also looked at the economic performance of these companies which paid the full rate versus the companies which didn't pay the full rate, and we found that there was not much of a difference.

So basically it means this policy reduced energy consumption -- and therefore emissions -- of the companies without affecting negatively competitiveness or economic performance, it seems.

The impact of the climate change levy on business

Do green energy taxes work to reduce energy consumption? Do they damage profitability or productivity?

The study

The introduction of the climate change levy provided the setting for a 'natural experiment': the researchers were able to evaluate firms' performance before and after the policy was introduced.

In this study the data were matched with different sources such as the European Pollutions and Emissions Register as well as information on climate change agreements from HM Revenue & Customs and DEFRA to compare outcomes of plants subject to the climate change levy (CCL) and plants that were granted an 80 percent discount on the levy after joining a so-called climate change agreement.

The data

The Annual Business Inquiry (ABI) is a survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics, which collects detailed financial data from companies in the UK. Conducted since the 1970s, the ABI is a source of comprehensive and longitudinal data for companies, covering turnover, costs, employment, industry, and investment. In particular, the ABI provides a measure of Gross Value Added, specific to each company, which industrial economists widely regard as a valuable measure of productivity.

The Quarterly Fuels Inquiry from the Department for Energy and Climate Change provides data on prices paid by industrial users of fuels in Great Britain. It also provides data on how much energy companies use, and what types of energy are consumed.

These datasets are confidential in nature because they are specific to each firm. They can only be accessed in a secure data enclave, which to now has been the ONS Virtual Microdata Laboratory (VML). Data from the Annual Business Inquiry are now available via the Secure Data Service.

The results

The results suggest that firms which had to pay the full rate of the CCL reduced energy consumption - primarily electricity - by more than they would otherwise have. At the same time the study did not find any negative effects on employment, output or productivity. Neither did it detect increased exit or closure of plants due to the levy.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change will be taking a strong interest in this study as they decide how to continue with policies such as the climate change levy in the future.

The authors

Ralf Martin is a research fellow in the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics.

Laure De Preux is a research assistant at the Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.

Ulrich Wagner is an assistant professor at the Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.